THIS BLOG IS NOW IN STASIS.


PLEASE VISIT MY NEW WEBSITES:


My other projects include:


TrueFreethinker.com


My side projects are:


Worldview and Science Examiner


Fitness Trends Examiner (wherein I review individual exercises and workout routines, diet and nutrition, supplements and healthy snacks)


My YouTube channel

11/22/08

Charity - Secular Liberals vs. Religious Conservatives

While we have been on this subject a bit this bit of information seemed relevant especially since London atheist are assuring us that not one single pence of the £83,000 / $124,392.19 they have raised (as of Oct 23rd) will go towards helping anyone in any way.
To read/Or not to read

It now seemed appropriate also to note a study about donations in relation to secular liberals and religious conservatives.

Frank Brieaddy wrote an article entitled Philanthropy Expert: Conservatives Are More Generous, in which he notes:

“Syracuse University professor Arthur C. Brooks is about to become the darling of the religious right in America — and it's making him nervous.

The child of academics, raised in a liberal household and educated in the liberal arts, Brooks has written a book that concludes religious conservatives donate far more money than secular liberals to all sorts of charitable activities, irrespective of income.
In the book, he cites extensive data analysis to demonstrate that values advocated by conservatives — from church attendance and two-parent families to the Protestant work ethic and a distaste for government-funded social services — make conservatives more generous than liberals.

When it comes to helping the needy, Brooks writes: ‘For too long, liberals have been claiming they are the most virtuous members of American society. Although they usually give less to charity, they have nevertheless lambasted conservatives for their callousness in the face of social injustice.’

He's a number cruncher who relied primarily on 10 databases assembled over the past decade, mostly from scientific surveys. The data are adjusted for variables such as age, gender, race and income to draw fine-point conclusions.

The book's basic findings are that conservatives who practice religion, live in traditional nuclear families and reject the notion that the government should engage in income redistribution are the most generous Americans, by any measure.
Conversely, secular liberals who believe fervently in government entitlement programs give far less to charity. They want everyone's tax dollars to support charitable causes and are reluctant to write checks to those causes, even when governments don't provide them with enough money.

‘These are not the sort of conclusions I ever thought I would reach when I started looking at charitable giving in graduate school, 10 years ago,’ he writes in the introduction. ‘I have to admit I probably would have hated what I have to say in this book’

…liberals give less than conservatives in every way imaginable, including volunteer hours and donated blood.

Harvey Mansfield, professor of government at Harvard University and 2004 recipient of the National Humanities Medal, does not know Brooks personally but has read the book. ‘His main finding is quite startling, that the people who talk the most about caring actually fork over the least,’ he said. ‘But beyond this finding I thought his analysis was extremely good, especially for an economist. He thinks very well about the reason for this and reflects about politics and morals in a way most economists do their best to avoid.’”

4 comments:

  1. This is an ad campaign more than any "charity". There are secular charities out there, but unlike xians who seem to feel to crow about their righteousness, we just don't make a big deal of it.

    That, and there's no strings attached with secular charities. No message to listen to, no pressure to convert, etc.


    By the way, what did your "lord" think of people who made a big public show of their goodness or righteousness in the bible?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Not only is the comparison with the London advertisement campaign retarded (it was NEVER supposed to be a charity) but, if you'd read the book, you'd realize that the difference is actually not clear cut at all.

    Both demographic segments give about the same to charity, the difference comes from the church-goers giving to their own church on top of that.
    I would argue that such tithes are not charity gift.

    ReplyDelete
  3. For the heck of it, here's an example of a secular charity group that an atheist is donating time to.

    ReplyDelete
  4. .

    A couple of real good articles I did:

    http://religiopoliticaltalk.blogspot.com/2009/05/liberal-democrats-mussolini-npr-and.html

    http://religiopoliticaltalk.blogspot.com/2006/11/defending-faith-over-syrah-my-first.html

    .

    ReplyDelete